FSA Accreditation Training
Become your organization’s resident expert in healthy argument
Overview:
This immersive accreditation training transforms key organizational and educational leaders into in-house experts who can shift cultures from fearing disagreement to embracing it as a catalyst for growth. With a particular focus on Israel-related conversations, this comprehensive program equips you with both the deep theory and practical skills needed to create lasting change within your organization.
Over 2.5 intensive days, you’ll master the FSA approach to healthy argument, learning not just how to navigate difficult conversations yourself, but how to train others, design educational materials, and build sustainable systems that transform how your organization engages with argument.
You’ll join a selective cohort of 10-15 educational leaders from across the Jewish community, creating a collaborative network that extends far beyond the retreat itself. After completing the training, you’ll become the leader who brings clarity, guidance, and resilience to every conversation in your organization.
You’ll return as an accredited FSA-educator with the tools, confidence, and ongoing support to create the kind of environment where difficult topics become opportunities for deeper connection and learning.
Deep dive into the theories and research behind healthy argument
Gain new frameworks and thinking about redlines and guidelines for arguments
Get to know what others in the field are struggling with
Analyze and learn from the FSA Introductory session
Practice teaching the FSA Introductory session
Receive constructive critique and support
Gain the skills of asking questions that open up rather than shut down
Learn to choose the right subject matter for your group
Plan for your organization
Workshop Details
$4500 for 2 participants
$6000 for 3 participants
Upon completion, you will:
- Become an accredited FSA-educator
- Master practical training skills to teach healthy argument to your community
- Develop curriculum design tools for integrating FSA methods into your programs
- Serve as your organization’s go-to resource for navigating controversial topics and circumstances
- Build sustainable internal capacity, giving your organization independence and immediate access to expertise when needed
- Shift organizational culture from avoidance or polarization to curiosity and growth
- Join a collaborative network of peers for ongoing support and innovation
- Create lasting impact beyond your individual development
- Become an embedded change agent who influences entire organizational culture
- Develop systems and approaches that outlast staff transitions
To Be Announced
Each cohort is limited to 15 participants. Early application recommended
Educational leaders, program directors, and senior staff who influence curriculum, training, or organizational culture in organizations.
This is a comprehensive training focused on creating internal expertise. You’ll learn both the theory behind the argument and practical skills to train others and design curriculum.
No prior experience required. This training is designed for both newcomers and those familiar with our approach. We would recommend checking our approach before coming though, to make sure it fits with you!
Official recognition as an FSA-educator, ongoing access to resources, continued support from our team, and ability to represent FSA pedagogy in your work.
No. This accreditation trains you to implement FSA methods within your own organization, not teach on behalf of For the Sake of Argument. You’ll be equipped to train your own staff and community members using our approach.
This training creates sustainable internal capacity, reducing need for ongoing consulting while building expertise that impacts your entire organization.
Ready to become your organization’s changemaker?
Transform how your organization navigates disagreement by developing deep expertise in healthy argument.
Join a selective cohort of educational leaders committed to embracing argument as a tool for connection.
“Before the conversation started, we were asked to respond to a prompt and say how strongly we held our belief. It changed the way we entered the discussion. Everyone had already reflected, and that helped shape the tone.”
Shalom Hartman Institute